How to stop printing bad proofs

by Shelby Sapusek on January 18, 2012

Money jar depicting savings on proofsThis was originally posted on JimRaffel.com on Jan. 9, 2007. It has been revised for this blog. You can view the original here.

At the close of 2006, ColorMetrix CEO Jim Raffel presented three proofing New Year’s resolutions, which he promised to expand upon in 2007. Resolution #1 stated that printers should “increase productivity by decreasing time wasted to re-print bad proofs.” It sounds simple; and it can be.

First, printers must start measuring the color bar they output on every proof with process control software, such as ColorMetrix’s ProofPass. Implementation of color verification solutions allows for analysis of the historical data using a built-in trending module or exported data into an application such as Microsoft Excel.

By doing this over a period of time (we suggest a month), printers will be able to determine the normal variation of their proofing process. Not every proofing system has the same normal variation; nor do any two similar proofing systems have identical variation. Once the normal variation is known, reasonable and achievable tolerance levels for the proofing system can be built.

If the tolerance levels from the previous step of this process are not what is wanted, don’t be discouraged. We still have meaningful historical data which will allow us to make process improvements. Using this information allows us to dig into the database. For instance, we would be able to see that an inkjet proofing paper from a vendor has a delta E variation beyond what a printer is willing to accept over a month’s time. The key is that process changes will be made based upon objective fact and not subjective opinions.

The process changes made will continue to improve the ongoing process, which will result in fewer and fewer defective proofs. Each defective proof no longer being made has a cost savings associated with it. When you add up all these little cost savings, you can quickly calculate the return on investment of your hard copy, color proofing process control software solution. In our experience, the entire cost of the ProofPass system is recovered in less than one month in many cases.

{ 0 comments }

Print is not dead

by JimRaffel on March 11, 2011

WhatTheyThink.com recently reported that, January 2011 U.S. Commercial Printing Shipments Up +4.1%, Good Start to New Year. Obviously, this is good news for an industry where the reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated. Clearly the industry has changed and realigned with the reality of the world in 2011. Will the 1970s and 80s heyday of long-run publication and commercial printing ever return? That’s doubtful, in this author’s opinion. Instead, at ColorMetrix we believe print needs to do more than convey information to compete with the internet; either that or provide a vehicle to drive eyes to the web. Here are a few items I’ve come across recently to support the hypothesis.

Color-Logic

image of color-logic certified partner ColorMetrix has been a Color-Logic technology partner since mid-2010. If you have not yet had the opportunity to see the special effects for print they can accomplish, we would highly recommend you request a sample kit. The unique Color-Logic process metallic color system works with offset, flexo, digital and large format inkjet printing. The design software allows the incorporation of effects with a single mouse click in applications like InDesign and Illustrator. For best results, a color chart is produced on your device. So the results are predictable; as long as you are using ProofPass.com for process control as recommended by Color-Logic. Printed pieces produced with Color-Logic effects stand out in the crowd and get noticed.

Meet-Meme

Image of Meet-Meme CardOne of our clients does the printing and production work for the Meet-Meme social media trading cards. When I was first exposed to the cards almost a year ago I noticed some significant color variation and asked how they were producing the cards. We got together and by installing ProofPass at both their locations have been able to improve the consistency and repeatability of the four digital devices producing the cards. It’s been equally exciting to watch the growth of the cards in functionality and popularity. Each card now contains a QR Code that leads to a personal micro-site. From the micro-site, you can connect with the card owner and share with the world that you’ve met. There’s plenty more to come but this author has personal experience with how well these cards convert into social media engagement. At a recent social media conference, I gave away 75 cards and gained over 100 followers on Twitter. Print utilized properly will drive folks to the web and convert into clicks.

Updated Viewing Standards

If printing was so dead why would we be updating viewing standards like ISO 3664-2009? I’ve had the opportunity to view booth/bulb combinations conforming to both the old and new standards. There is a big difference now that the UV portion of the spectrum is included in the standard. As one might suspect the difference is most apparent when the substrates in question contain a significant amount of optical brighteners. As you consider this and the two examples of print not being dead above, it all starts to make perfect sense. Print in 2011 and beyond is going to be specialized and highly personalized. These pieces are going to be produced to get noticed. That means bright papers with lots of optical brighteners and special inks like Color-Logic.

That’s our take from around the industry as to why print is not dead. We’d love to hear your thoughts.

{ 2 comments }

Proper Press Fingerprinting Takes Commitment

February 24, 2011

This post originally appeared on JimRaffel.com on March 21, 2007, and has been repurposed for this blog. In this installment, we will address the third question Dale raised in #47. Dale’s first two questions were answered in #48 and #49 which can be reviewed at JimRaffel.com. Now, on to Dale’s third question: 3. In fingerprinting [...]

Read the full article →

Brand color management has a bright future

August 27, 2010

Let’s start by breaking down the title of this post. “bright future” implies that past brand color management practices have not delivered desired outcomes – true. “Brand color” refers to the precise color the brand owner is expecting to be reproduced regardless of substrate, print process or geographic location. “Management” is the meat of this [...]

Read the full article →

Color Conversations: Density & TVI or L*a*b?

July 9, 2010

Golden Nugget #5 Density & TVI or L*a*b* originally appeared on JimRaffel [dot] com in 2005. the topic is one that still comes up frequently in conversations with customers. I settled on the topic of using Density & TVI vs. L*a*b* to evaluate the difference between inkjet proofs and press sheets not only because it [...]

Read the full article →

Color & The State of the Printing Industry 2010

June 21, 2010

Color & The State of Printing Industry 2010 was originally published on JimRaffel [dot] com on January 1st of this year. We are working on a private community where more content of this nature will be available exclusively for our customers. Sign up for our RSS feed to stay informed of the progress. It never ceases to amaze me [...]

Read the full article →

Color Conversations is Coming April 6th

April 2, 2010

Beginning April 6th there will be a weekly blog post here. Hello there, my name is Jim Raffel and I am one of the founders of ColorMetrix. For several years now I have written a blog at JimRaffel.com.  For most of those years the blog was printing industry-centric but over the last year that has [...]

Read the full article →